What is the Relationship Between Parent and Subsidiary Company?
Introduction
In the complex and evolving world of corporate structures, parent and subsidiary relationships have become increasingly prominent, both in Nigeria and globally. Multinational corporations, conglomerates, holding companies, and diversified enterprises often structure their operations through subsidiaries to achieve tax efficiency, risk mitigation, asset protection, and regulatory compliance.
But what does the relationship between a parent and its subsidiary truly entail? Is the subsidiary completely independent, or is it merely an extension of the parent? How is liability distributed? What are the implications for corporate governance, financial reporting, and legal responsibility?
This article explores in-depth the legal, operational, and financial relationship between parent and subsidiary companies—focusing on Nigerian law and global best practices. A detailed case study is included to illustrate how courts interpret this relationship in real-life business disputes.
1. Definition of a Parent and Subsidiary Company
a. Parent Company
A parent company is a company that controls another company by owning more than 50% of its voting shares, or having the power to appoint or remove a majority of its board of directors.
b. Subsidiary Company
A subsidiary company is a company that is controlled by a parent company, either through ownership of voting stock or through contractual arrangements that give control.
2. Types of Control
Majority Ownership – Parent holds more than 50% of voting shares
Board Control – Parent can appoint or remove board members
Contractual Control – Through management contracts or shareholder agreements
De Facto Control – When the parent influences decisions even without majority ownership
3. Key Characteristics of the Parent–Subsidiary Relationship
Feature | Parent Company | Subsidiary Company |
---|---|---|
Ownership | Majority shareholder | Owned and controlled |
Legal Status | Separate entity | Separate legal entity |
Control | Exerts strategic influence | Follows parent’s decisions |
Financial Reporting | Consolidates subsidiaries | May report independently |
Liability | Not directly liable for subsidiary’s debts | May be sued independently |
4. Legal Nature of the Relationship
In Nigerian law (as in most common law jurisdictions), the parent and subsidiary are separate legal entities. The corporate veil separates the companies, even if one owns the other.
However, courts may “lift the veil” in cases of fraud, sham arrangements, or if the subsidiary is merely an alter ego of the parent.
Key Principle:
“A company is a separate legal personality distinct from its shareholders.”
(Salomon v. Salomon & Co. Ltd. [1897] AC 22)
5. Formation of a Subsidiary
Steps to create a subsidiary in Nigeria:
Register a new company with the Corporate Affairs Commission (CAC)
Parent company holds majority or 100% of shares
Appoint a board of directors for the subsidiary
Draft shareholder agreements, if required
Establish financial and operational control mechanisms
6. Operational Relationship
While legally independent, the parent may:
Set the strategic direction
Control key financial decisions
Approve budgets and capital expenditure
Appoint or remove senior management
Provide infrastructure, branding, or intellectual property
7. Financial Relationship
Consolidated Accounts: Under IFRS and Nigerian financial regulations, the parent must consolidate the accounts of its subsidiaries.
Dividends: Subsidiaries may declare dividends to parent.
Inter-company Loans: Parent may lend funds or provide guarantees to the subsidiary.
Transfer Pricing: Must be fair and compliant with tax laws to avoid abuse.
8. Corporate Governance Implications
Subsidiary must have its own board of directors
Parent may nominate directors but should not micromanage
Board decisions must serve the subsidiary’s interests, not only the parent’s
Legal independence must be maintained to avoid liability piercing
9. Advantages of Using Subsidiaries
Risk Isolation – Limits liability to the subsidiary
Regulatory Compliance – Meet sector-specific licensing requirements
Tax Efficiency – Exploit local tax advantages
Brand Differentiation – Launch different products or services under separate entities
Geographic Expansion – Operate in different states or countries under localized control
10. Disadvantages and Legal Risks
Piercing the Corporate Veil: Courts may hold the parent liable if separation is illusory
Reputational Risk: Scandal in a subsidiary may tarnish the parent brand
Conflict of Interest: Parent’s control may conflict with fiduciary duties of subsidiary directors
Transfer Pricing Investigations: For cross-border subsidiaries
Double Taxation Risks: Where tax treaties are not efficiently utilized
11. When Courts Ignore the Legal Separation
Nigerian courts (like their UK counterparts) may “lift the corporate veil” in the following situations:
Fraud or Misrepresentation
Undercapitalization of the subsidiary
Sham transactions
Agency Relationship: Where the subsidiary acts as agent for the parent
Single Economic Entity: When the companies operate as one unit without separation
12. Nigerian Case Law
Adeyemi v. Lan & Baker (1997) 6 NWLR (Pt. 510) 534
The court reiterated that the parent company and its subsidiary are separate legal entities and should be treated as such unless there is fraud.
UBN Plc v. Ajabule (2011) LPELR-8239(CA)
The Court of Appeal emphasized that the mere fact of shareholding or management overlap does not create liability unless the subsidiary is a façade.
13. Global Case Reference
DHN Food Distributors Ltd v Tower Hamlets LBC [1976] 1 WLR 852
The UK court treated parent and subsidiaries as a “single economic unit” and lifted the veil to award compensation, emphasizing economic realities over formalities.
14. Real-Life Case Study – Nigeria
Case Study: Parent Company Liability in a Failed Real Estate Subsidiary
Background: A real estate conglomerate in Lagos, “Chaman Holdings Ltd,” formed a wholly-owned subsidiary “Chaman Properties Estates Ltd” to handle a new estate development in Arepo. Due to mismanagement and litigation with landowners, the project failed, and multiple buyers sued for refunds.
Legal Question: Can Chaman Holdings Ltd (the parent) be held liable for the failure and debts of Chaman Properties Estates Ltd?
Key Facts:
Chaman Holdings appointed all directors of the subsidiary
The same office and staff were used
All funds were collected in the parent’s name
Court Findings:
The companies were not truly independent
The corporate veil was lifted
Chaman Holdings was held jointly liable for refunds
Outcome: Buyers were compensated, and the case became a landmark in piercing the veil in Nigerian real estate.
Lessons:
Separate structure is not enough; separation must be real
Always differentiate operations, finances, and branding
Internal governance matters
15. Best Practices for Managing the Parent–Subsidiary Relationship
Maintain Separate Bank Accounts and Records
Hold Distinct Board Meetings
Avoid Commingling of Funds
Ensure Independent Decision-Making
Observe Transfer Pricing Rules
Follow Formalities for Loans and Guarantees
Disclose Relationships in Financial Statements
16. Regulatory Oversight in Nigeria
Corporate Affairs Commission (CAC) – Registration and reporting
FIRS (Federal Inland Revenue Service) – Tax and transfer pricing
SEC (Securities and Exchange Commission) – For listed parent companies
CBN (Central Bank of Nigeria) – For banking subsidiaries
NAICOM, NCC, and others – For regulated sectors
17. Tax Considerations in Parent-Subsidiary Structures
Dividends paid by Nigerian subsidiaries to Nigerian parents are not taxed twice
Inter-company services must follow arms-length rules
Foreign-owned subsidiaries must comply with withholding tax and capital repatriation regulations
18. Parent and Subsidiary in Insolvency and Liquidation
A parent company is not liable for a subsidiary’s insolvency, except in fraud cases
Creditors of a subsidiary cannot go after the parent’s assets
However, the court may hold parent liable if intermingling of funds or fraudulent transfers are proven
Conclusion
The relationship between a parent and subsidiary company is a powerful tool in corporate structuring—offering flexibility, risk separation, and strategic expansion. However, it also requires responsible governance, legal compliance, and a clear understanding of the boundaries between control and autonomy.
In Nigeria, both statutory law and case law uphold the separation of entities. But courts are ready to intervene when the parent company uses the subsidiary to avoid liability, defraud creditors, or abuse trust.
Entrepreneurs, lawyers, investors, and corporate executives must understand this relationship not just from a business lens but also from a legal and compliance perspective.
Structuring a Parent–Subsidiary Company? Do It the Right Way—Legally and Strategically.
Whether you’re planning to expand your business, protect your assets, or operate across different industries, a well-structured parent–subsidiary relationship can offer flexibility, tax benefits, and legal protection.
But without proper legal guidance, you risk corporate veil piercing, regulatory sanctions, or even financial loss.
At Chaman Law Firm, we help you:
✅ Register and structure both parent and subsidiary companies
✅ Draft inter-company agreements, shareholder contracts, and governance policies
✅ Ensure regulatory compliance with CAC, FIRS, SEC, and more
✅ Prevent liability and protect your business from internal and external risks
✅ Represent you in restructuring, litigation, or audits
📞Phone: 08065553671, 08096888818
✉ Email: chamanlawfirm@gmail.com
📍 Address: 115, Obafemi Awolowo Way, Allen Junction, Ikeja, Lagos, Nigeria
🌍Click here to learn more about Chaman Law Firm
Chaman Law Firm – Your Right, We Protect.
Let’s build your corporate structure the right way—professionally, legally, and profitably.