5 Proven Key Insights on Police Prosecution in Nigerian Courts

Need help with Legal Matters?

Get free legal advice

Contact us to get the best legal advice for your legal matters today from the top lawyers in Nigeria

Table of Contents

Police Prosecution in Nigerian Courts
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
WhatsApp

 Proven Key Insights on Police Prosecution in Nigerian Courts

Introduction

Police prosecution in Nigerian courts plays a critical role in the administration of criminal justice. The Nigerian Police Force (NPF) is empowered to investigate crimes, arrest suspects, and prosecute offenders in courts, particularly in magistrate courts where a large percentage of criminal cases commence. While police prosecution is an integral aspect of Nigeria’s criminal justice system, it is fraught with several challenges, including legal limitations, issues of competence, and concerns about fairness in criminal trials.

This article examines the legal framework governing police prosecution in Nigeria, the challenges associated with police-led prosecutions, landmark judicial pronouncements, and recommendations for reform.


Legal Framework for Police Prosecution in Nigeria

Police prosecution in Nigeria derives its legitimacy from the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria 1999 (as amended) and other subsidiary laws that guide criminal proceedings in Nigerian courts.

1. Constitutional Provisions

The 1999 Constitution vests the Attorney General of the Federation (AGF) and the Attorney General of a State (AG) with the power to prosecute criminal matters. Section 174(1) and Section 211(1) respectively confer these powers on the AGF and state AGs. However, police prosecutors derive their authority from other statutes, as the Constitution does not explicitly grant them prosecutorial powers.

2. The Police Act 2020

The Nigeria Police Act 2020 is the primary statute regulating police powers, including investigations and prosecutions. The Act provides that police officers can prosecute cases in Magistrate Courts, subject to the directives of the Attorney General. However, it does not extend the power of prosecution to superior courts such as the High Courts.

3. The Administration of Criminal Justice Act (ACJA) 2015

The ACJA 2015, which applies to federal courts and has been adopted by several states, introduces far-reaching reforms in criminal justice administration. Section 106 of the ACJA stipulates that only legal practitioners are permitted to prosecute cases in courts. This provision raises concerns about the legality of police prosecution, as most police prosecutors are not lawyers.

4. The Police Prosecution Role in Magistrate Courts

The Magistrate Courts handle the bulk of criminal cases in Nigeria. Traditionally, police prosecutors are allowed to present cases in these courts. This is in line with the provisions of the Criminal Procedure Act (CPA) and Criminal Procedure Code (CPC) applicable in southern and northern Nigeria, respectively. However, the interpretation of the ACJA 2015 has led to debates on whether police officers without legal qualifications should continue prosecuting cases.


Judicial Pronouncements on Police Prosecution

Over the years, Nigerian courts have delivered landmark judgments regarding the validity and scope of police prosecution.

1. FRN v. Osahon (2006) 5 NWLR (Pt. 973) 361

In this case, the Supreme Court upheld the right of legally qualified police officers to prosecute criminal matters. The ruling stated that police officers who are legal practitioners have the authority to prosecute cases in court. However, this decision left ambiguity regarding whether non-lawyer police officers can prosecute cases.

2. Joseph Nwankwo v. The State (2019) LPELR-47089(CA)

The Court of Appeal reiterated that under the ACJA, only legally qualified persons should prosecute criminal cases. This judgment aligned with the growing argument that police officers without legal qualifications should be barred from prosecuting cases.

These rulings highlight the ongoing legal debate about the role of the police in criminal prosecution and the need for reforms to clarify their prosecutorial functions.


Challenges of Police Prosecution in Nigerian Courts

Police prosecution faces several systemic and procedural challenges that affect the efficiency and fairness of Nigeria’s criminal justice system. Some of the major issues include:

1. Lack of Legal Qualifications

Many police prosecutors lack legal training. While some police officers are law graduates, the majority who prosecute cases in Magistrate Courts have no formal legal education. This leads to:

  • Poorly prepared cases.
  • Inadequate understanding of legal principles and procedures.
  • High rate of prosecution failures due to technical errors.

2. Overburdened Magistrate Courts

Magistrate Courts, where police prosecution primarily occurs, handle an overwhelming number of criminal cases. The burden on police prosecutors and magistrates leads to:

  • Delays in hearing cases.
  • Inadequate time for case preparation.
  • Increased chances of wrongful prosecution due to rushed trials.

3. Lack of Proper Investigation Before Prosecution

A fundamental problem with police prosecution is that cases often proceed to trial without thorough investigation. This results in:

  • Frivolous cases that lack sufficient evidence.
  • Increased rate of case withdrawals due to weak prosecution.
  • Unfair detention of suspects who could have been discharged earlier.

4. Bias and Abuse of Power

There are concerns that police prosecution may be influenced by bias or abuse of authority. Police officers may:

  • Manipulate charges against defendants.
  • Use prosecution to settle personal scores or to serve external interests.
  • Engage in extortion by pressuring suspects to pay bribes to avoid prosecution.

5. Lack of Adequate Training and Resources

Police prosecutors often lack access to essential legal resources, such as:

  • Updated legal texts and statutes.
  • Legal research tools.
  • Proper case management systems.

Without these resources, their ability to argue cases effectively in court is compromised.

6. Procedural Delays and Inconsistencies

Criminal trials in Nigeria often suffer from delays due to:

  • Frequent adjournments.
  • Absence of police prosecutors in court.
  • Poor coordination between investigators and prosecutors.

These delays contribute to prolonged detention of accused persons and a backlog of unresolved cases.


Reforming Police Prosecution in Nigeria

To enhance justice delivery and ensure efficient prosecution, the following reforms should be considered:

1. Restricting Prosecution to Legally Trained Professionals

Given the complexity of criminal prosecution, only legally trained individuals should be allowed to prosecute cases. This means:

  • Expanding the role of state prosecutors to handle cases in Magistrate Courts.
  • Allowing only police officers with law degrees to serve as prosecutors.

2. Enhancing Police Training on Criminal Law

If police prosecution is to continue, officers should receive:

  • Comprehensive legal training in criminal law, procedure, and evidence.
  • Mandatory certification programs for police prosecutors.
  • Continuous legal education and professional development.

3. Strengthening the Role of the Directorate of Public Prosecutions (DPP)

The DPP at both federal and state levels should take a more active role in criminal prosecutions by:

  • Vetting criminal cases before they proceed to court.
  • Assigning qualified lawyers to handle cases in lower courts.
  • Providing legal oversight to police prosecutors.

4. Improving Case Management and Investigation Procedures

To reduce wrongful prosecutions, the police should:

  • Conduct proper investigations before filing charges.
  • Establish prosecutorial guidelines to prevent abuse of power.
  • Ensure proper coordination between investigators and prosecutors.

5. Adoption of Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) in Minor Offenses

For minor offenses, ADR mechanisms such as mediation and restorative justice should be promoted. This will:

  • Reduce the burden on Magistrate Courts.
  • Ensure faster resolution of minor cases.
  • Prevent unnecessary incarceration of offenders.

6. Leveraging Technology for Case Tracking

The police and judicial system should introduce:

  • Electronic case filing and tracking systems.
  • Digital databases to enhance case management.
  • Automated legal research tools for prosecutors.

These innovations will improve efficiency and transparency in criminal prosecution.


Conclusion

Police prosecution remains an essential but controversial aspect of Nigeria’s criminal justice system. While police officers play a crucial role in maintaining law and order, their involvement in prosecution should be limited to legally qualified officers or gradually phased out in favor of state prosecutors.

Addressing issues such as lack of legal training, weak investigations, and prosecutorial bias will go a long way in ensuring fair, transparent, and efficient justice delivery. By implementing legal reforms and modernizing prosecution processes, Nigeria can enhance the credibility of its criminal justice system and strengthen the rule of law.

📞 For legal representation and advice on criminal justice matters, contact Chaman Law Firm today

📞Phone: 08065553671, 08096888818

Email: chamanlawfirm@gmail.com

📍 Address: 115, Obafemi Awolowo Way, Allen Junction, Ikeja, Lagos, Nigeria

🌍Click here to learn more about Chaman Law Firm

Your Right, We Protect! 🚀

To Top