How are Conflicts Resolved Under the Land Use Act?

The Land Use Act of 1978 in Nigeria not only governs land allocation and ownership but also recognizes that land-related conflicts can arise. To address these disputes, the Act includes provisions for conflict resolution mechanisms. This article explores how conflicts are resolved under the Land Use Act, providing insights into the various methods available for settling land-related disputes.

1. Administrative Resolution:

The Land Use Act establishes a clear administrative process for addressing land disputes. In many cases, land-related conflicts are resolved at the local government level. The Act provides for local land officers who are responsible for resolving disputes and ensuring that land allocations are carried out according to the law. Parties involved in a conflict may approach the local land officer, who will attempt to mediate and find an amicable solution.

2. The Role of the Governor:

In cases where conflicts cannot be resolved at the local government level, the Act grants the state governor the authority to intervene. The governor has the power to mediate and settle disputes, make decisions on land allocations, and issue statutory rights of occupancy. This is especially important when disputes involve large land allocations or competing claims.

3. The Court System:

When all else fails, land disputes can be brought before the court. The Land Use Act allows for judicial intervention in cases where parties are unable to reach an agreement through administrative channels. Litigation can be a time-consuming and costly process, but it provides a legal framework for resolving disputes and enforcing land rights.

4. Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR):

Nigeria has seen a growing use of alternative dispute resolution mechanisms in land-related conflicts. ADR methods like mediation and arbitration can be less adversarial and more cost-effective than litigation. They provide a forum for parties to discuss their issues and reach mutually acceptable resolutions.

5. Traditional Conflict Resolution:

In many Nigerian communities, traditional authorities and customary law play a significant role in settling land disputes. Communities often have established methods for resolving conflicts, and these mechanisms are recognized and respected by the Land Use Act. Customary arbitration, village heads, or community leaders may be involved in settling land disputes.

6. Surveyor-General's Office:

In cases where land disputes are primarily related to land boundaries or measurements, the Surveyor-General's office, as discussed in a previous article, can provide expert testimony and evidence to assist in resolving the dispute. They play a crucial role in determining accurate land boundaries.

It's essential to note that the specific resolution process for a land-related conflict may vary depending on the nature and complexity of the dispute. Parties involved in the conflict, as well as the nature of the land in question, influence which mechanism is most appropriate.

In conclusion, the Land Use Act recognizes the inevitability of land-related conflicts and provides a range of mechanisms for their resolution. Whether through administrative channels, legal proceedings, or traditional methods, the Act ensures that land disputes are addressed in a fair and just manner, promoting land tenure security and peace in Nigeria.

WRITTEN BY CHAMAN LAW FIRM TEAM

Email: chamanlawfirm@gmail.com, info@chamanlawfirm.com

TEL: 08065553671, 08024200080