Critical Insight: Understanding Employer’s Vicarious Liability in Nigeria
INTRODUCTION
In the ever-evolving terrain of employment law in Nigeria, the doctrine of employer’s vicarious liability holds a significant place. It governs the relationship between an employer and their employee in terms of liability for wrongful acts. But what exactly is employer’s vicarious liability? Why is it important, and how does it apply in practical, legal, and judicial contexts in Nigeria?
This article dives deep into employer’s vicarious liability, unpacking its definition, principles, practical application, case law, and legal implications. By the end, you’ll have a thorough understanding of how this doctrine works and why every employer and employee should be aware of it.
What Is Employer’s Vicarious Liability?
Employer’s vicarious liability is a legal principle that holds an employer responsible for the wrongful acts or omissions of their employee, provided those acts occur within the course of employment. Essentially, even if the employer did not directly commit the wrong, they may still be held liable due to their legal relationship with the employee.
This concept arises primarily under tort law but finds relevance in contract law and criminal law as well. It is grounded in the idea of respondeat superior—a Latin phrase that means “let the master answer.”
Essentials of Vicarious Liability
For an action to fall under employer’s vicarious liability, two essential conditions must be satisfied:
-
Existence of Employer-Employee Relationship
There must be a legally recognized employment relationship. Independent contractors, agents, or third parties generally fall outside this purview. -
Act Must Occur Within the Course of Employment
The wrongful act must occur during the course of employment. Acts done during working hours, using employer’s resources, or under the employer’s instructions are often within this scope.
The Rationale Behind Employer’s Vicarious Liability
Why should an employer be held accountable for something they didn’t personally do? The rationale includes:
-
Control: The employer exercises control over the employee’s actions during employment.
-
Risk Creation: The employer introduces certain risks to the public by engaging employees to perform tasks.
-
Economic Benefit: Since employers benefit from their employees’ services, it is fair for them to bear liability for wrongful acts.
-
Deterrence: It encourages employers to properly train and supervise their employees.
Scope and Limits of Employer’s Vicarious Liability
Acts Within Course of Employment
Courts generally consider an act within the course of employment if it:
-
Is authorized by the employer.
-
Is a mode (albeit improper) of performing an authorized act.
-
Occurs during official working hours or on employer premises.
Acts Outside Course of Employment
An employer will not be held vicariously liable if:
-
The employee was engaged in a “frolic of his own”.
-
The act was outside the scope of the job description.
-
The wrongful act was committed outside working hours and offsite.
Relevant Case Law on Employer’s Vicarious Liability in Nigeria
1. Lagos State Government v. Johnson (2013) LPELR-20974(CA)
In this case, a government driver, while transporting goods for the state, negligently caused an accident. The court held that the Lagos State Government was vicariously liable, since the driver acted within the course of his employment.
2. Nigerian Breweries Plc v. David Audu (2009) LPELR-8875(CA)
Here, an employee assaulted a customer while on duty. The Court of Appeal ruled that employer’s vicarious liability applied, as the wrongful act happened during working hours and within the premises of employment.
3. Minister of Police Affairs v. Okoroafor (2007) All FWLR (Pt. 368) 1016
A police officer, while in uniform, shot a civilian unlawfully. The court held the Minister of Police Affairs vicariously liable, reinforcing the doctrine’s applicability to government and public institutions.
Employer’s Vicarious Liability and Independent Contractors
It is important to note that employers are not vicariously liable for acts committed by independent contractors. The legal reasoning here lies in the fact that the employer does not exercise control over the manner in which independent contractors perform their tasks.
However, exceptions exist, such as when:
-
The task delegated is inherently hazardous.
-
The employer has a non-delegable duty (e.g., safety measures in a public place).
Employer’s Duty of Care and Training
Modern interpretation of employer’s vicarious liability also considers whether the employer exercised reasonable care in:
-
Hiring qualified staff
-
Providing adequate training
-
Supervising employees
-
Implementing workplace policies
If an employer neglects these responsibilities, the likelihood of being held vicariously liable increases, especially if the wrongful act was foreseeable.
Employer’s Vicarious Liability in Criminal Cases
Although primarily a civil law concept, employer’s vicarious liability can apply in criminal cases in limited circumstances, particularly where corporate criminal responsibility is involved.
For example, if a company knowingly allows employees to commit environmental crimes or fraud, both the employee and employer may be prosecuted.
Comparison with Other Jurisdictions
United Kingdom
The UK Supreme Court in Mohamud v. WM Morrison Supermarkets plc (2016) expanded the scope of employer’s vicarious liability. The court held that even intentional acts (such as assault) may be attributed to an employer if sufficiently connected to the employment.
South Africa
South African courts apply the same “close connection” test. In K v. Minister of Safety and Security, the state was held liable for a rape committed by on-duty police officers.
Practical Implications for Employers in Nigeria
Employers should take proactive steps to mitigate the risks associated with vicarious liability, including:
-
Drafting clear job descriptions
-
Conducting background checks
-
Training employees on legal compliance
-
Establishing grievance and disciplinary procedures
-
Ensuring adequate insurance coverage
Remedies Available to the Victim
A victim of a tortious act committed by an employee may:
-
Sue the employer directly under vicarious liability.
-
Claim damages for physical, emotional, or financial harm.
-
Seek injunctive relief where applicable.
This legal remedy provides a more secure source of compensation, especially when the employee has no means to pay damages.
Limitations and Challenges
Despite its usefulness, the doctrine of employer’s vicarious liability faces some criticisms and challenges:
-
It may unfairly burden employers, especially SMEs.
-
Distinguishing between course of employment and personal pursuits is sometimes difficult.
-
The rise of remote and gig work complicates its application.
Courts have to tread carefully to balance justice for the victim and fairness to the employer.
Conclusion
In conclusion, employer’s vicarious liability is an indispensable part of Nigerian employment law. It serves as a safeguard for victims of employee misconduct and incentivizes employers to implement robust workplace policies and monitoring.
For any company operating in Nigeria, understanding and managing vicarious liability risks is not just a legal requirement—it’s a strategic imperative.
If you’re an employer or HR professional, ensuring that you implement sound legal frameworks and training can be the difference between exposure and protection.
Need legal advice on how to safeguard your company from liability? Speak to an expert today at CHAMAN Law Firm—your trusted legal partner in Nigeria.
NB: This article is not a legal advice, and under no circumstance should you take it as such. All information provided are for general purpose only. For information, please contact chamanlawfirm@gmail.com
WRITTEN BY CHAMAN LAW FIRM TEAM
EMAIL: chamanlawfirm@gmail.com
TEL: 08065553671, 08024230080